<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ThunderBayes 0.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2006/12/thunderbayes-01/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2006/12/thunderbayes-01/</link>
	<description>Puzzlings on software development and other topics of interest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 23:57:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2006/12/thunderbayes-01/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2006/12/thunderbayes-01/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>The one-button setup is a neat idea, except for one thing:  What do we do for ham emails that SpamBayes classifies as &quot;Unsure&quot;?  We really need two buttons, so we can tell SpamBayes whether the Unsure emails are ham or spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one-button setup is a neat idea, except for one thing:  What do we do for ham emails that SpamBayes classifies as &#8220;Unsure&#8221;?  We really need two buttons, so we can tell SpamBayes whether the Unsure emails are ham or spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
