<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ThunderBayes 0.1.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2006/12/thunderbayes-011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2006/12/thunderbayes-011/</link>
	<description>Puzzlings on software development and other topics of interest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr33d0m</title>
		<link>http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2006/12/thunderbayes-011/comment-page-1/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr33d0m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2006/12/thunderbayes-011/#comment-724</guid>
		<description>Would be usable if there were some way to un-mark messages it wrongly think are spam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be usable if there were some way to un-mark messages it wrongly think are spam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2006/12/thunderbayes-011/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2006/12/thunderbayes-011/#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Top job,

It took me a while to decide to make the leap from Outlook to Thunderbird, the so, so built in spam filtration or the need to fiddle with an external proxy to enable SpamBayes being one of the main reasons for hesitation.

Although I had some initial trouble because I did not read the instructions, which resulted in me running the SpamBayes proxy both externally and internally (doh), after realising my blunder the ThunderBayes add-in is working perfectly. Without the facility to mark mail that it offers, I am not sure I would be quite so happy with sticking with Thunderbird .

What a tool! Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top job,</p>
<p>It took me a while to decide to make the leap from Outlook to Thunderbird, the so, so built in spam filtration or the need to fiddle with an external proxy to enable SpamBayes being one of the main reasons for hesitation.</p>
<p>Although I had some initial trouble because I did not read the instructions, which resulted in me running the SpamBayes proxy both externally and internally (doh), after realising my blunder the ThunderBayes add-in is working perfectly. Without the facility to mark mail that it offers, I am not sure I would be quite so happy with sticking with Thunderbird .</p>
<p>What a tool! Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott D</title>
		<link>http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2006/12/thunderbayes-011/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2006/12/thunderbayes-011/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>This is a great add-in for Thunderbird.  I have an email account that was used for public discussion lists etc for many years that gets over 600 spam emails every day. The built-in TB spam filter was too timid and a waste of time. My personal email goes to Outlook using SpamBayes, and I hardly ever see any spam survive in the inbox. Now, I can have that same quality filtering in TB without setting up TB as a proxy, which is a bit of a hassle in my situation. Thanks for the great add-in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great add-in for Thunderbird.  I have an email account that was used for public discussion lists etc for many years that gets over 600 spam emails every day. The built-in TB spam filter was too timid and a waste of time. My personal email goes to Outlook using SpamBayes, and I hardly ever see any spam survive in the inbox. Now, I can have that same quality filtering in TB without setting up TB as a proxy, which is a bit of a hassle in my situation. Thanks for the great add-in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2006/12/thunderbayes-011/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 02:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2006/12/thunderbayes-011/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>This sounds very cool.  I&#039;ll try to make time to give it a try over the break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds very cool.  I&#8217;ll try to make time to give it a try over the break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

