Comments on: RE: Peek-a-boo I CC You http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2007/01/re-peek-a-boo-i-cc-you/ Puzzlings on software development and other topics of interest Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:00:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: floor jack http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2007/01/re-peek-a-boo-i-cc-you/comment-page-1/#comment-18980 floor jack Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:49:36 +0000 http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2007/01/re-peek-a-boo-i-cc-you/#comment-18980 It's the first time I commented here and I must say that you give genuine, and quality information for other bloggers! Great job. p.s. You have a very good template . Where have you got it from? It’s the first time I commented here and I must say that you give genuine, and quality information for other bloggers! Great job.
p.s. You have a very good template . Where have you got it from?

]]> By: wooden serving trays http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2007/01/re-peek-a-boo-i-cc-you/comment-page-1/#comment-231 wooden serving trays Sat, 17 Nov 2007 07:40:49 +0000 http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2007/01/re-peek-a-boo-i-cc-you/#comment-231 This is a very important feature, and if it were used everywhere it should be used there would be at least a few less opportunities for spammers to get their hands on huge lists of valid email addresses. This is a very important feature, and if it were used everywhere it should be used there would be at least a few less opportunities for spammers to get their hands on huge lists of valid email addresses.

]]> By: Jillian http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2007/01/re-peek-a-boo-i-cc-you/comment-page-1/#comment-183 Jillian Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:54:24 +0000 http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2007/01/re-peek-a-boo-i-cc-you/#comment-183 Thank you for this useful information. Thank you for this useful information.

]]> By: Jacob http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2007/01/re-peek-a-boo-i-cc-you/comment-page-1/#comment-82 Jacob Sat, 10 Feb 2007 19:30:18 +0000 http://pieces.openpolitics.com/2007/01/re-peek-a-boo-i-cc-you/#comment-82 You make an interesting point about the reply-to-all bcc conundrum. The problem is that in many cases someone with a bcc may not realize that no one else knows they received the original email. This leads the other recipients to wonder if a) their email is getted forwarded, or b) if the original sender is someone that they can trust. I would opt for a closed door meeting enhancement with bcc - for example, when adding people to bcc there should be For-Your-Eyes-Only and Read-Only checkboxes that prevents others from forwarding or replying to the email. You make an interesting point about the reply-to-all bcc conundrum. The problem is that in many cases someone with a bcc may not realize that no one else knows they received the original email. This leads the other recipients to wonder if a) their email is getted forwarded, or b) if the original sender is someone that they can trust.

I would opt for a closed door meeting enhancement with bcc – for example, when adding people to bcc there should be For-Your-Eyes-Only and Read-Only checkboxes that prevents others from forwarding or replying to the email.

]]>